Monday, February 17, 2014

Remembering Lot's Wife

[A friend asked me for this.  It was originally CRM's Reaping Success, Vol. 31 (April 2004).]

Most of the important lessons in life we get from people.  We learn how to talk by imitating our parents. They also show us how to learn almost anything providing only that someone else has already learned it.  Just think how dull it would be to live among people devoid of experience! Experience also has the interesting power to operate in reverse.  It can teach us to avoid those activities that have already been proven to be unprofitable.

I have always felt very sorry for Cain, who lived when the world was so new that very little actual experience had been accumulated.  When Cain became jealous of the success and righteousness of his brother, Abel, he was unable to properly solve his problem, partly because there was no such evil experience to warn him of his danger.  And of himself he was not strong enough to obey God’s law without some actual illustrations of the dangers of disobedience.  From this point of view, we who live in this present age might feel very fortunate, as we have had the profitableness, as well as the unprofitableness of every situation demonstrated and proven over and over again.  We know for ourselves which fruit will come from a given seed.  Right shines out more clearly in contrast with wrong.  It is easier to distinguish between important or unimportant experiences when they are arranged side by side.

Our appreciation of the virtues of the tortoise are more meaningful when set in opposition to the faults of the hare.  The deeds of the good Samaritan are more memorable when viewed alongside the self-interest of the priest and the Levite.  Everyone makes a contribution to our welfare.  The villain serves our success, quite as well as the hero.  One shows us the experiences to be avoided while the other is setting up the examples for us to follow.

We owe a great deal to the scholars, saints, and heroes, but owe an equal debt to the failures, fools, and sinners.  When the first man put his hand on a red hot stove, he made all future pain from that source unnecessary.  In the same way, the villain teaches us to hate unfairness, the sinner makes evil more repulsive, and the reverse action of failure motivates greater ambition in us.  If we love righteousness, the tragedies, mistakes, and sins of others tend to put us in a position to score for good.

One of the most helpful of the negative performers to play upon the stage of the scripture was Lot’s wife. Lot was the nephew of Abraham, and when the Lord moved Abraham away from the idolatry of his homeland, Lot went along.  The Lord had promised to make of Abraham a great nation with Lot and his wife included as beneficiaries.  And it was not many years before they were both enjoying great prosperity, with large holdings of livestock, lands, and goods.  In order to simplify their operations Abraham was appointed to divide the land, and when Lot was given his first choice, he selected the will-watered Jordan plain lying eastward toward Sodom, which the Bible says “looked like the garden of the Lord.”  (Gen. 13:11)

But apparently the Lot family were a little too harmonious with the Sodomites, as they moved into their city to live with them.  This is where their trouble began, inasmuch as the people of Sodom were extremely wicked.  The Bible says that they sinned exceedingly before the Lord.  When their wickedness reached its climax, God decided that Sodom and her equally wicked sister city of Gomorrah must be destroyed.

Abraham tried to intercede, on the grounds that the righteous should not be destroyed with the wicked.  So the Lord offered to spare Sodom if 50 righteous inhabitants could be found. Abraham bargained a little further, and finally the Lord agreed to call off the destruction if only ten righteous Sodomites could be located.  But they sealed their own doom when even ten righteous were not forthcoming.  Then two angels were sent to get Lot and his family out of the city.  Because there was not much time, Lot was urged to hurry.  The angels said, “Escape for thy life; look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain; escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed.”  (Gen. 19:17) But Lot had some difficulty even with his own family. The idea of destruction seemed so ridiculous to the sons-in-law that they refused to leave.  Then the record says, “And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot, saying, Arise, take thy wife, and thy two daughters, which are here; lest thou be consumed in the iniquity of the city.”  But even Lot hesitated, and the record says, “And while he lingered, the angels laid hold upon his hand and upon the hand of his wife, and upon the hand of his two daughters, and set them without the city.”

Then we read, “The sun was risen upon the earth when the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven; and he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all of that which grew upon the ground.”  (Gen. 19:16-25) But when Lot’s wife left Sodom, she left her heart behind her.  And she was not quite strong enough to carry out the commandment of the angels against looking back.  Finally when she could stand the strain no longer, she moved to the rear of the line.  Then when no one was watching, she looked back.  The record says, “But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.”  (Gen. 19:26)

Luke indicated that this idea of looking back on sin would also be a part of our own problem. While he was making a comparison between the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and the destruction that will attend our own society at the second coming of Christ, he said, “Remember Lot’s wife.”  (Luke 17:32) Because Lot’s wife disobeyed she became a pillar of salt.  But she has also become the emblem of this trait of vacillation and indecision that is never quite sure of itself.  It’s pretty hard to go ahead very fast when one is interested in what is happening behind us.  To “remember Lot’s wife” may keep us from making her mistake. We may not always look where we are going, but we can be pretty sure that we will usually go where we are looking.

Back in the old days on the farm, the horses’ bridles were equipped with blinders to give their attention a forward focus.  When the horses were without blinders, the distractions from right and left caused them to step on too many plants or to make a crooked furrow.  A good pair of blinders on Mrs. Lot’s emotions might have saved her life.

But looking back still causes some of our biggest problems.  Jesus probably had “blinders” in mind when he said, “Keep your eye single.”  He meant, keep your vision focused and your mind on your duty.  When we listen to the voices enticing us from behind, the power of our forward purpose is usually lost.  Looking back to their old ways was one reason why people failed to follow Jesus.  And he said to them, “No man, having put his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.”  (Luke 9:62) In other words, he said, “Remember Lot’s wife.”

A teacher was once telling her Sunday School class this story about how Lot’s wife had looked back and turned into a pillar of salt.  A young member of the class volunteered the information that while his mother was driving the family car she had looked back and had turned into a telephone pole.  But when some other people look back they turn into vacillators, procrastinators, failures, and sinners.  The Apostle James points out that “A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways.”  But Lot’s wife had a double interest with a serious conflict–one interest was ahead and the other was behind.

One can’t very well hang onto his past in Sodom and avoid the fire and the brimstone that God rains down upon it.  In addition, some of the greatest prizes of life are lost while we are hesitating and reconsidering, with one eye on the rear.  Even in asking God for wisdom, James says, “But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed.”  He says, “...let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord.”  (James 1:5-7) Uncertainty, indecision, and double interests always cause wavering, and wavering is always bad business.  When we try to keep one eye on the past, we not only waver in our faith, but we also waver in our occupations and in every other thing.

It has been said that no farmer ever becomes very wealthy by watering last year’s crops. Yet with many regrets and often with freely flowing tears, we continue to water the irrevocable past.  Frequently we expand our greatest effort and waste our most powerful emotions on events that are forever dead.  No one can live effectively in the challenging present or face an unknown future with confidence, while his thoughts are buried in the musty past.

It is one of the marks of immaturity to moan over what cannot be helped.  Shakespeare had the right idea when he said “things without remedy should be without regard.”  This applies not only to our mistakes but also to our failures and sins.  One of the great laws of God promises forgiveness to anyone who genuinely repents.  But God’s forgiveness is often nullified because the sinner does not forgive himself.  What good does it do for God to blot out our evil from his mind if we continue to let it dominate our thinking by rerunning it in our own?

Sometime ago I talked with a woman 53 years of age who had committed a moral transgression at age 18. She understood that her sin was very serious, but because she had repented a thousand times we can depend on the Lord’s promise that he had forgiven her. But she had never forgiven herself.  Because she felt unclean and inferior, she withdrew from her friends, refused to marry, and became a kind of social and spiritual recluse. For 35 years she downgraded herself with bitter regrets and accusations.  Her life of looking back upon her sin has turned her into something far below the wonderful person that God intended her to be. Her sin at age 18 was very serious.  But for 35 years she has been adding to her sin by wasting the most valuable thing in the world, which is a splendid human life.

We must learn to forgive ourselves and clean the evil out of our memories.  We need to unburden our lives of the heavy load of guilt and inferiority that can prevent accomplishment in any department of life.  As we cling to our sins we multiply them.  By looking back on failure we confirm it and make it permanent.  Only after we repent, reform, and forget, are we in a position to set our hand steadily on the plow to develop new ground.

We cannot even afford to look back on our successes for longer than it takes to confirm their lessons.  For as someone has said, “You can’t win this year’s ball games by reading last year’s press notices.”  When our minds are so fully occupied with last year’s victories, we have too little room for present accomplishment. When we look ahead from age 25, we must expect forty years of experience in a working lifetime.  When we look back we may merely get the same year’s experience repeated forty times.  George Washington once said, “Never look back except to derive useful lessons from past errors and profit from our dearly bought experience.”

But, the motto, “Remember Lot’s wife,” may also help us profit from her dearly bought experience.  Her service to us is similar to that of the baseball player who makes a sacrifice hit, enabling the team to score the winning run.  And by practicing the experience of Lot’s wife in reverse, we can turn ourselves into wonderful successes.

It seems to me to be very appropriate to think carefully of those who have failed, in order that we might better install the opposite as a part of our own successes.  Therefore in the negative section of my own mental hall of fame, I have placed the statues of some of life’s benefactors whose mission is to show us what not to do.  Against the dark background of their fate we can see our own destiny more clearly.  Jezebel stands for colorful wickedness. Cain is the emblem of fratricide.  Judas represents betrayal.  The rich man who traded his soul for bulging barns filled with goods that he couldn’t use personifies foolishness.  The early life of the prodigal son is a visualization of a wasted soul.  And then standing there alone on the mountainside, high above the plains of Sodom, is the pillar of salt, reminding us of those defects of vacillation and hesitation that are bred in our souls when we permit our eyes or our spirits to turn backward.

Sterling W. Sill, “Lot’s Wife,” in , What Doth It Profit?, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, Inc., 1965), pp. 179-184.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Why I Believe: Evidence Four: Isaiah 2 In 2 Nephi 12

101 Reasons Why I Believe Joseph Smith Was A Prophet



Evidence Four: 
Isaiah 2 in 2 Nephi 12© 


Second Nephi chapter 12 is an interesting chapter for a number of reasons.  For one, it is the beginning of Nephi’s quotations from the book of Isaiah in this portion of the Book of Mormon starting with Isaiah 2. Isaiah 2 is famous in its own right, but especially among Mormons.  Verses two and three are Isaiah’s famous prophecy about the temple in the last days. 
2.  And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. 
3.  And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
This prophecy was also copied almost verbatim by the prophet Micah (see Micah 4:1-2), so it is not particularly unusual for other prophets to show interest in this passage.   In addition to the important and interesting subject matter of a temple in the last days, a recent article by Jeffrey Chadwick*, professor of religion at BYU has brought to light another tidbit that gives one pause in respect to Joseph Smith and the origin of the Book of Mormon.

I start off with an observation and a question.  Chapter 12 of 2 Nephi is the first of a dozen chapters from Isaiah excerpted into the Book of Mormon.  They run from Isaiah 2 through 14.  Why did Joseph Smith start with chapter two instead of chapter one?  Well, it turns out that the possible answer is very interesting.  Dr. Chadwick points out that some scholars believe that chapter one is out of chronological order.  Section 1 of our Doctrine and Covenants is a “preface” to the book and it too is out of chronological order.  Sequentially it fits between Sections 66 and 67, but the Lord instructed Joseph to put it in the front of the book.  Chadwick believes that something similar is involved with Isaiah chapter 1.

The story is a bit involved, but here is my simplification.  Isaiah chapters 2-35 are a prophetic section which was probably composed by Isaiah prior to the Assyrian invasion of the Holy Land in 701 BC.  Isaiah 36-39 relate the story of the invasion and form a historical bridge between this first section and chapters 40-66 which were likely composed after the Assyrian attack and treat very different themes than the first part.

So what about chapter 1?  Chadwick argues that it too was written after 701 B.C., in fact, right after chapters 36-39, but is placed at the beginning of the book as an introduction to the entire work.  Here Isaiah “addresses the aftermath of the destruction of all the kingdom of Judah but Jerusalem.  This was the conclusion of a disaster that had started with the total destruction of the kingdom of Israel two decades earlier.” (p. 368)  Thus, chapter two is chronologically the first of Isaiah’s writings, which significantly, begins with  a prophecy about a new temple in Jerusalem. 

If all of this is correct, and I don’t know of any serious reasons why it isn’t, then it makes sense that Nephi would not include chapter 1 in his excerpt, because theme-wise it was considerably different than the twelve chapters he excerpted into 2 Nephi.  This leaves me wondering, as things like this so often do, how did Joseph Smith know this? It seems like he always gets the detail right!  But of course he did not write this book, he translated it by the “gift and power of God.”  That is the real key to all the correct details we encounter in his work.

Thank God for Joseph Smith.  Lets think together again, soon.

*See: Jeffrey R. Chadwick.  “The Great Jerusalem Temple Prophecy: Latter-day Context and Likening unto Us.”  In Ascending the Mountain of the Lord: Temple, Praise, and Worship in the Old Testament, edited by David R. Seely, Jeffrey R. Chadwick, and Matthew J. Grey, 367-83.  The 42d Annual Brigham Young University Sidney B. Sperry Symposium.  Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2013.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

The Insufficiency of Technology

I have been reading some of the “Strictly Personal” newspaper columns of Sydney Harris in my morning reading.  Harris combines the enviable (to me at least) talents of being both thoughtful and articulate, even eloquent. He is sophisticated, urbane, intellectual, but he is also practical, almost common.  And he is liberal.  No matter, because I enjoy him for his talent, though I often disagree with what he says.

This morning I came across a piece he must have written before or in the early stages of the computer revolution.  His article is titled “We Pay a Heavy Price for Gadgets.”  He isn’t talking about I-Pads, Smart Phones, and digital wizardry–his reference was the radio and television.  Nevertheless, he sounded a thoughtful warning about the essential insufficiency of technology to the mind and spirit of mankind, portions of which I thought were appropriate to a column on “Living Philosophies.”  They are reproduced below:

“...there is a law of diminishing returns in such devices.  The worst thing about a man-made miracle is that it soon comes to be accepted as commonplace.
... 
This psychological fact–the dwindling returns of pleasure from mechanical objects, so that we constantly require new gadgets to titillate our jaded emotions–is one of the soundest reasons for giving our children [a] ‘humanistic’ education.... 
For it is only in the world of the mind and imagination that we can find the eternally recurring springs of enjoyment. 
Nobody who has ever taken the trouble to read Shakespeare can ever tire of his poetry; nobody who has learned how to listen to Beethoven has ever been known to grow weary of his ‘old’ music. 
Works of art contain their own sources of rejuvenation; and the greater the work, the more ‘new things’ one can find in it year after year.  Hamlet is an inexhaustible play; you can never get to the ‘bottom’ of it. 
Children who grow up with an understanding and an appreciation of this heritage have infinitely more to sustain and delight and console them through life than those children who are given nothing but material objects. [Sydney J. Harris, The Best of Sydney J. Harris, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976, p. 329.]

Lets think together again, soon.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Why I Believe: Evidence Three: Joseph's Humility in Leadership

101 Reasons Why I Believe Joseph Smith Was A Prophet



Evidence Three: 
Joseph’s Humility In Leadership© 


A number of my reasons for believing Joseph Smith was a prophet coalesce around his leadership.  Because this is a topic which interests me greatly and which is treated too seldom in our literature, I will have occasion to return to this subject several times.  Joseph Smith was an extremely effective leader, so much so that he is frequently described as “charismatic.”  The term can mean many things when applied to leaders, but usually implies a powerful personal influence on others.  

My interests are in the spiritual principles which he understood and lived by which led to a leadership style that was different from the norm of his day and ours.  The principles of his leadership style come directly from heaven; it is a “divine style” of leadership.  I am not claiming that Joseph Smith was perfect in any way including his leadership.  However, he possessed characteristics and principles, the divine nature of which shine through his life despite his weakness and inadequacies.  

One of his greatest leadership traits was humility.  I know, we so often hear from his enemies and some misguided Latter-day Saints about the strength and force of his personality which seem to belie any humility. There is no question he was a man of great action, again often misunderstood as expressions of hubris and arrogance.  But when you get down deep into the documents and into the interior of his life an attractive and sweet humility emerges through the mists of contemporary caricatures.

It can be seen for example–and I will subsequently write about these things in more detail–in his response to the chastisement he received at the time of the loss of the 116 pages of the Book of Mormon manuscript. Or, given his investment of time and energy in translation and the suffering associated with its publication, it was a remarkable achievement.  Yet Joseph made little of the book’s appearance or his involvement with it. Or, consider that much of 2 Ne. 3 is a lengthy series of complimentary prophecies concerning him and his mission, including one statement in which the Lord said that he would “make him great in mine eyes, for he shall do my work” (vs. 8), but as far as I am aware, Joseph Smith did not make a single statement regarding any of these prophecies.  His humility is also highly evident in his prayer life–particularly those found in his private journal.  I could go on, but as I said, these things are for another day.

This entry highlights one incident and his meek response to it.  In interest of full disclosure, I acknowledge that I was reminded of this episode while reading an excellent article by Mark Mendenhall and J. Bonner Ritchie regarding the leadership of Joseph and Hyrum in councils.* In June of 1831, Joseph Smith convened a conference and ordained the first high priests. During that meeting he ordained a man named Harvey Whitlock.  Soon after he did so Whitlock’s countenance changed and it was evident to Hyrum Smith that something was seriously out of order.  According to Levi Hancock’s account Hyrum said, “Joseph, that is not of God.”  Joseph replied “Do not speak against this.”  But Hyrum persisted, “I will not believe,” he said, “unless you inquire of God and he owns it.”  Joseph could have put Hyrum in his place–and on a later occasion in Nauvoo when Hyrum was out of order Joseph did correct him.  But this time Joseph bowed his head and after a short time got up and laid his hands on Whitlock and commanded Satan to leave him.

Lesser men may have spurned Hyrum’s questioning of their authority. If Joseph were prideful and arrogant he would likely have ignored Hyrum. Nor did he reprove his brother with sharpness as mentioned in D&C 121; he was not moved upon by the Holy Ghost to do so.  Despite his closeness to God and despite all the revelations and visitations he received, Joseph did not consider himself omniscient or infallible.  Rather, he demonstrated one of the hallmarks of humility–he was teachable.  He listened to his brother, reconsidered the situation and took the appropriate action to get the guidance of the Spirit.  One of the things I admire most about him is when he discovered his mistakes he exhibited the necessary humility to quickly repent or change just as he did in this historical priesthood meeting. Humility such as Joseph’s is a saintly quality of leadership that is largely absent in the practice of many leaders of our modern world.

Thank God for Joseph Smith.  Let’s think together again, soon.

*See, Mark E. Mendenhall and J. Bonner Ritchie, “One Heart and One Mind: Councils in Zion, Zion in Councils,” in Joseph & Hyrum: Leading as One, edited by Mark E Mendenhall, et al., (Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2010, pp. 1-20.

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Book Review: Newt Gingrich, Breakout.

America, the greatest nation on earth and greatest hope for the future of the world, also has monumental problems big enough to threaten its greatest nation status and knock her from the pedestal of being the hope of the future if they are not solved.  Poverty, a gigantic inefficient bureaucratic government, an ineffective and costly educational system, 15 trillion in national debt with cities and states facing bankruptcy, 2.3 million criminals in prison-the highest rate of any developed country, the break down of the family, rising costs of healthcare, decaying infrastructure, transportation gridlock, and dependency on fossil fuels are perhaps the Top Ten among the biggest of America’s problems.

Former speaker of the House of Representatives and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich tackles many of these issues in a new book, Breakout.  The core thesis of the book is that amazing technological advances and creative thinking are producing potential solutions to these problems.  However, there exists in every one of these fields what Gingrich calls “the prison guards of the past” who through one means or another hinder these advances that have so much potential to move America forward.  America is poised for breakouts in many areas but special interest groups, fear, greed, complacency, and other motivations are holding her back.

Chapters begin with a discussion of amazing developments in a specific field such as education and the potential those developments portend.  This is followed with example upon example of how the prison guards have or are checking the potential.  Nevertheless, Gingrich's enthusiastic optimism and his vision of America’s future fueled by these innovations permeates the book.  Each chapter is punctuated with ideas and suggestions of how creativity, ingenuity, innovation, and technology may address America’s problems.

Two chapters which especially interested me are those about education and health.  A brief look into  some of the ideas in the one on education may serve to give readers an idea of Gingrich’s approach.  (I’ll say more about health in a future blog.)  In the chapter on education he doesn’t spend a great deal of time discussing America’s woes regarding education.  Perhaps he feels the issue is understood well enough without much elaboration. He does say, however, that “We are on the edge of a dramatic transformation from bureaucratic education to individualized learning.” (p. 26) This is largely through technologies of communication, information and learning that are rapidly evolving and made available primarily through the Internet.  The problem is that despite this virtual revolution in transmitting knowledge, schools and universities have been especially slow to accept the change and advance the transformation.  

But hope is out there.  Gingrich highlights the now well-known Khan Academy.  Salman Khan has produced thousands of short video clips which teach mathematics from elementary to graduate school level math and 100s of thousands of students worldwide are using them to learn math.  The concept can be applied to nearly every conceivable subject matter.  For Gingrich two important benefits derive from this approach–it is free and can be virtually universal.  

Not surprisingly, however, there is a counter attack from traditional teachers.  Without going into the detail in the book, the telling point for me is that those opposing the Khan Academy are content to point out its flaws, but show no understanding of and exhibit no enthusiasm for its potential, therefore they offer no encouragement to create a better version.  

The chapter also discusses the efforts of others to make high quality education at the university level available online either free or at significantly reduced cost.

The book is a call for politicians, interest groups, scientists, educators, and citizens to encourage innovation and put pressure on various bodies holding progress back so that America may enjoy significant breakouts in the areas of her greatest problems.  Whatever one may think of Gingrich and his politics, it is difficult to deny that he is one of America’s foremost creative thinkers relative to addressing her problems with new ideas and potential solutions.  He is both a thinker and an activist.  If there are comparable creative and innovative thinkers on the left who have offered as many suggestions as are contained in this book I am not aware of them.  If you are, please bring them to my attention.  I am interested in reading more. 

See: Newt Gingrich, Breakout: Pioneers of the Future, Prison Guards of the Past, and the Epic Battle That Will Decide America’s Fate.  Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2013.

Let's think together again, soon.

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Happiness: The Views Of Three Smart Men

INTRODUCTION


Today's "Living Philosophies" are the thoughts of three very smart men on the subject of happiness which are at once enlightening and thought provoking.  Enjoy!


DWB

RALPH WALDO EMERSON: The True Secret of Happiness


Whatever your goal may be, strike out for it.  What if you die in the attempt?  If you put every shred of yourself into the attempt, you will have had life's one great exhilarating and soul satisfying experience anyhow. When you start out to pursue your dreams, be prepared for a great discovery. It is the effort itself that will give you peace. This peace goes with you as you grow older, becomes your choicest companion, never leaves you. Wrestling this peace from a troubled world is about all there is to the secret of happiness.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, in Larry Bielat, Winning Words of Champions, (New York: Wings Books, 1995), p. 121.


BOOKER T. WASHINGTON: Those Who Do Most for Others Are the Happiest


The education that I received at Hampton out of the text-books was but a small part of what I learned there. One of the things that impressed itself upon me deeply, the second year, was the unselfishness of the teachers. It was hard for me to understand how any individuals could bring themselves to the point where they could be so happy in working for others.Before the end of the year, I think I began learning that those who are happiest are those who do the most for others. This lesson I have tired to carry with me ever since.

Booker T. Washington, Up From Slavery, (New York: Bantam Books, 1963), p. 46.


THOMAS JEFFERSON: Health, Learning, Virtue Ensure Happiness


Be assiduous in learning, take much exercise for your health & practice much virtue.Health, learning & virtue will ensure your happiness; they will give you a quiet conscience, private esteem & public honor. Beyond these we want nothing but physical necessaries; and they are easily obtained.

Thomas Jefferson to Martha Jefferson Randolph, 17 July 1790, in John P. Kaminski, ed., The Quotable Jefferson, (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006), p. 235.

Let's think together again, soon.

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Why I Believe: Evidence Two: How Ministers Are To Teach The Gospel To Non-members

101 Reasons Why I Believe Joseph Smith Was A Prophet



Evidence Two: 
How Ministers Are To Teach The Gospel To Non-members© 


Last week I initiated this series with comments about D&C 38:41 which imposed a high ideal upon Mormon ministers when preaching.  I observed that this seemed rather unusual for a lad of twenty-five years of age to give to the new church.  I want to follow up that with other statements by the youthful Prophet that give this ideal even greater significance to the young Church and its ministers.  This is further evidence to me of his prophetic calling and inspiration, and perhaps his uniqueness.

The passage quoted last week was one of a number of statements in Joseph Smith’s early revelations which instruct the ministry in the way of their duties.  In June of 1829, Section 18 of the Doctrine and Covenants was given. In verses 20-21 the Lord said to David Whitmer and Oliver Cowdery: “Contend against no church, save it be the church of the devil.  Take upon you the name of Christ, and speak the truth in soberness.”  In March of 1830, in Section 19:29 the Lord told Martin Harris to “declare glad tidings” and “publish it upon the mountains...among every people that thou shalt be permitted to see.”  In verses 30 and 31 the Lord instructed, 
And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.  And of tenets thou shalt not talk, but thou shalt declare repentance and faith on the Savior, and remission of sins by baptism, and by fire, yea, even the Holy Ghost. [Emphasis added.]
Ten months later the Lord gave the revelation quoted last week–D&C 38:41: “And let your preaching be the warning voice, every man to his neighbor, in mildness and in meekness.”  
By December of 1833, Joseph was including some of these things in his instructions to departing missionaries.  He cautioned them regarding their manner of interacting with non-members.
Let the Elders be exceedingly careful about unnecessarily disturbing and harrowing up the feelings of the people.  Remember that your business is to preach the Gospel in all humility and meekness, and warn sinners to repent and come to Christ.
Avoid contentions and vain disputes with men of corrupt minds, who do not desire to know the truth.  Remember that “it is a day of warning, and not a day of many words.”  [D&C 63:58] If they receive not your testimony in one place, flee to another, remembering to cast no reflections, nor throw out any bitter sayings.  If you do your duty, it will be just as well with you, as though all men embraced the Gospel. [Joseph Smith, HC 1:468; TPJS, p. 43, emphasis added.]
On 30 March 1836, preparations were being made for administering the sacrament in the Kirtland Temple.  An account of what transpired follows:
While waiting, I made the following remarks–that the time that we were required to tarry in Kirtland to be endowed, would be fulfilled in a few days, and then the elders would go forth...but to go in all meekness, in sobriety, and preach Jesus Christ and Him crucified; not to contend with others on account of their faith or systems of religion, but pursue a steady course.  This I delivered by way of commandment; and all who observe it not will pull down persecution upon their heads, while those who do, shall always be filled with the Holy Ghost; this I pronounced as a prophecy, and sealed with Hosanna and Amen. [HC 2:431; or TPJS, 109, emphasis added.]
Here Joseph makes it clear that these revelations constitute a commandment to missionaries.  A commandment with a promise. 

In a day when extreme and militant religionists dominate the planetscape, hate-filled promulgation of their faith by confrontation, argument, rudeness, vitriol, ridicule, insult, debate, falsehood, slander, deceit, persecution, violence, and even war are commonplace. The result?   Hearts grow cold and hard.  In attempting to drive many to God they are driven from him and those who claim to represent him.  The commandment Joseph Smith gave Mormon missionaries is consonant with the teachings of Jesus Christ when he said “love your enemy” and “love one another as I have loved you.”  And the promise is if they will keep these commandments they shall be “filled with the Holy Ghost”–the single most important thing for a missionary to possess in preaching the Lord’s gospel.  

Thank God for Joseph Smith.  Let's think together again, soon.
.