Sunday, January 25, 2026

Killings in Minnesota, Weaponization of Government Agencies, and Donald Trump: My Open Letter to Utah’s Federal Delegation©

 Killings in Minnesota, Weaponization of Government Agencies, and Donald Trump:

My Open Letter to Utah’s Federal Delegation© 

Introduction:

Today I sent the following letter to Utah Senators Lee and Curtis and my Representive Blake Moore, with the second to last paragraph appropriately adjusted for him. This is the first time I’ve written such a letter.

I did this because I GENUINELY BELIEVE that with the killings in Minnesota and Trump’s weaponization of the DOJ, DOD, FBI, and DHS, among many, many other things, constitute existential threats to our constitutional democracy. This must stop. And... WE CAN STOP IT! It only requires a few Republican senators and representatives with courage and integrity to join with the Democrats to impeach, convict and expel the twice impeached, convicted felon, and rapist who sits as president.

********

Dear Senator (Representative):

My name is Dan Bachman. I am an 82-year-old citizen of Logan, Utah. I was a lifelong conservative Republican until I became an Independent in 2023. I write to you now as a constituent deeply concerned about the rule of law and the future of our constitutional democracy.

I am protesting two matters of grave concern.

First, I am outraged by the recent deaths of two individuals in Minnesota at the hands of federal agents—one involving ICE and the other the U.S. Border Patrol. I have personally viewed the video of the shooting of Alex Pretti. Firing ten rounds into a man on the ground surrounded by multiple federal agents cannot reasonably be described as a lawful use of force. It appears, in effect, to be an extrajudicial killing.

What compounds this outrage is the President’s immediate public declaration that both killings were justified, which he made before any independent investigation. Even if Mr. Pretti were guilty of the allegations against him, guilt does not justify execution by federal officers.

Further, the President, Vice President, and Attorney General have declared that no investigation is warranted into the homicide of Nicole Good, while the Department of Homeland Security has announced it will investigate the Pretti case internally. Long-standing law-enforcement practice nationwide requires independent investigation of officer-involved deaths precisely to prevent abuse and overreach. Allowing DHS to investigate its own agents—particularly in the current federal climate—is the textbook example of letting the fox guard the henhouse.

I urge you to insist upon open, fair, and independent investigations into both deaths and to demand limits on the excessive federal agent presence now operating in Minnesota.

Second, I am deeply alarmed by the ongoing weaponization of the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security. These institutions are being used to punish political opponents, brand dissent as disloyalty, and threaten retribution against those who refuse submission. The deployment of masked federal officers as enforcers marks a dangerous step toward authoritarian rule.

I respectfully urge you to help safeguard our constitutional democracy from a President who has placed himself above constitutional restraints. You hold the power to act. Working with a small number of Republican senators and Democratic colleagues, you have the constitutional authority to impeach, convict, and remove a President who has shown open contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law.

I am confident history will judge how Congress responds to this time of profound constitutional peril.

Respectfully,

Danel W. Bachman

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Why I Oppose Donald Trump: An Open Letter to My Friends Who Support Him©

 Why I Oppose Donald Trump: 

An Open Letter to My Friends Who Support Him© 

[Personal note of apology to my friends: A previous version of this essay was published Friday, 9 January 2026 titled “The Heart of a Champion: An Open Letter to Some of My Friends Who Are Trump Supporters.” I have taken it down and replaced it with this one because the first effort was directed in a personal way about the thinking and attitudes of Trump supporters. That was injurious and inappropriate and my friends have my apologies for that display of poor judgment. This one, considerably longer, concentrates solely on why I oppose the sitting president.] 

*****

As the first year of Donald John Trump’s second presidency draws to a close, the case against his leadership grows more urgent. Concerns rooted in patterns established during his first term have not receded but have intensified—now carried forward with greater frequency and force, more blatant in expression, more driven by grievance and anger, and more directed toward personal profit. The consequences are now more dangerous. These apprehensions stem from deliberate actions that persist, intensify, and compound over time: an intentional, steady degradation of democratic norms and the rule of law, a sustained erosion of legal and ethical restraints, and a deepening normalization of conduct once disqualifying for high office.

Trump’s presidency continues to be marked by unpredictability and excess. His public speech routinely veers into recklessness, his pronouncements oscillate between incoherence and provocation, and his behavior rejects the discipline required of the US President entrusted with immense executive power. Chaotic governance under these conditions destabilizes institutions at home and breaks down credibility and trust abroad.

President Trump values personal power and loyalty above expertise and effective governance. He shows little regard for science, relying instead on his elementary understanding, shallow biases, and the advice of those who simply agree with him. He has a penchant for conspiracy theories that reinforce his authority and sustain his prejudices.  By sidelining expert guidance on national security, public health, and climate, his administration leaves the country exposed to serious, avoidable dangers. Ignoring professional advice in these areas makes catastrophic mistakes more likely—mistakes that could cost lives, destabilize communities, and weaken the nation’s ability to respond to crises. 

The consequences ripple across the country. Policy decisions on everything from food, medicine and public health, to energy, climate, the economy, and global threats, falter. Valuable precedents are ignored, public programs struggle to function, and both economic and international stability suffer. Citizens face real harm when government agencies operate chaotically, international agreements are abandoned, and resources mismanaged. This is not abstract—it erodes the daily functioning of government and the well-being of the American people.

Donald Trump presides over the United States with a disregard for law and principle that sets the tone for the entire government. His conduct directly degrades both office and nation: he boasts of lawless impunity, employs cruelty—at times even savagery—as a political tool, and abuses authority in ways that echo far beyond American shores, from Mar-a-Lago to foreign capitals.  Following his lead, the government normalizes injustice, coercion, and abuse of power, turning a nation once hailed as the world’s exemplar of liberty and constitutional democracy into a case study of how swiftly institutional guardrails weaken when leadership treats law as optional and restraint as weakness, showing that power, not principle, now governs.

More troubling is the broader moral and civic decline under Trump. As his offenses multiply, the nation plunges into a social decline of historic proportions—a horrifying descent in plain sight. Across his two presidencies, the world has seen how rapidly moral and ethical foundations crumble. 

This term, the country entrusts power to a convicted felon and a man found liable for sexual assault, and that, astonishingly, marks only the beginning. The slope downward grows steeper, the pace swifter, and the peril to institutions and society more profound. The rupture intensifies as the Supreme Court affirms presidential immunity, effectively confirming a view of executive power untethered from ordinary legal constraint. Even the least wary among us might have foreseen that such license, granted to such a temperament and appetite for dominion, would unleash excess beyond measure—and so it has.

His undisciplined mind, ungoverned passions, and unrestrained impulses convert executive power into an arbitrary despotic exercise of authority and misrule that, like a magnet, turns the nation’s moral compass and undermines ethical standards of public life. This repeated impunity sets a precedent, making clear to others in government—and, by extension, to society at large—that law, ethics, and accountability are unimportant and optional. In this way, moral corruption spreads beyond the Oval Office, eroding institutional norms and weakening shared responsibilities and obligations that sustain civic life.

It is equally damaging when the President turns belittling, bullying, ridiculing, and humiliating reporters, the disabled, fallen soldiers, Muslims, political opponents, and others into spectacle—when cruelty becomes entertainment and contempt wins applause at rallies. When mocking rivals replaces debate and intimidation replaces persuasion, citizens shrink from speaking out, dissent is silenced, and full participation in civic life ceases. National discourse is poisoned, the moral fabric of the nation suffers profoundly, and the very practices that sustain democracy begin to unravel.

The President shows no regard for the truth. During his first administration, The Washington Post documented more than 30,000 of his false or misleading statements. While it has not tracked them this term, his mendacity remains notorious, his lies limitless. When leaders treat truth as unimportant and disposable, society suffers and democratic choice becomes unattainable. Systematic lying, attacks on journalism, and the replacement of evidence with loyalty-driven narratives distort reality, corrode public trust, and make informed debate impossible. Undermining truth, shared facts, and common understanding is not merely a rhetorical tactic—it constitutes a direct assault on the foundation of a functioning democracy. It destroys social cohesion, fuels polarization, suspicion, and distrust among citizens, weakens civic responsibility, and threatens the very mechanisms of democracy itself, including faith in elections, the impartiality of courts, and the freedom of the press. 

The danger reaches deep into the structure of government as the president weaponizes the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Department of Defense, turning them into instruments of personal vengeance—punishing opponents, branding dissenters as traitors, and dreaming of retribution against anyone who refuses to kowtow to his will. Repeated conflicts of interest and the use of public office for private gain further erode trust in government institutions and degrade the moral authority of the presidency. This directly undermines the rule of law, because a constitutional system relies on the independence of its institutions. The line between lawful authority and personal rule begins to vanish as these agencies serve his goals of consolidating power, instilling fear, enforcing loyalty, stifling dissent, obstructing accountability, retaliating against critics, and, above all, delivering punishment.

Seizing every opportunity to aggrandize himself, Donald John Trump seeks not merely to rule America as a sovereign, but to stand as master of the world, persuaded of his own unrivaled genius. In him, power becomes a license for excess, subject to his corrupt will. The consequence is no longer theoretical risk but observable abuse and societal decline.

Taken together, these patterns reveal an administration whose persistent hubris, defiance, ignorance, and rebellion undermine the rule of law, embolden cruelty, weaken democratic norms, fragment society, and transform authority from a stewardship into an implement of oppression of the less powerful.

My opposition to Donald Trump does not rest on partisan preference, it is existential. It arises from the conviction that democracy, the Constitution, separation of powers, checks and balances, liberty and individual rights, the rule of law, the discipline of accountable power, and the basic norms of civic decency are foundational and inviolate. Donald Trump does not merely threaten these foundations—he actively works to dismantle them. When leadership engages in such sustained destruction, standing aside is no longer an option. Resistance is justified; it is a civic duty.  

Let's think together again, soon.

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Is Distraction All President Trump Has Left?©

 Is Distraction All President Trump Has Left?© 

Today, S.E. Cupp published an opinion piece in the Midland Daily News. She has followed the President for ten years. Manys the time she thought he was finished, but “teflon Don” always seems to recover. However, now she thinks she possibly sees the beginning of the end in her article “This Really May Be the Political End for Trump.”   

She lists six reasons for her hope: 1) The polls, calling attention to the recent Gallup poll which shows the President’s approval down -24% from - 1% in January. Only Nixon was worse than this at the same point in his second term. 2) The economy, thanks to tarrifs, DOGE cuts, “profligate spending,” and incompetence, the national debt has exploded. 3) His personnel, meaning Bondi, Hegseth, Patel, Kennedy, the last of which she writes: “Scientists from nearly every field of study have called for his head of health and human services to be replaced.”  And she noted the secretary of homeland security may be prosecuted for contempt. 4) His party, noting recent splits with Greene, Mace, GOP senators ignoring the President’s call to end the fillibuster, state legislators rejecting redistricting efforts, not to mention his historical loss on the Epstein files vote. 5) His media surrogates: top MAGA supporters on Youtube and other platforms who tend to alienate center “normies” by “elevating neo-Nazis, excusing pedophilia,” and love conspiracy theories. 6) Most of all, is Trump himself.  I quote at length:

Monday night, Trump flooded Truth Social with more than 160 posts in five hours — an unhinged mix of high and low, from posting his cameo in “Home Alone 2” to demanding disgraced Colorado election official Tina Peters be released from prison.

It was a disturbing look at someone who’s clearly lost control — of his presidency, of his party, of his messaging. Flooding the zone with utter nonsense to distract us all from his obvious failures is seemingly all he has left.(1)

"Disturbing look" indeed! Truly a pathetic picture of any man, but doubly so of POTUS.  She could have written a whole essay on this single element of his decline. The MAGA base have to be beside themselves watching this chaos and self-destruction, not on an occasional basis, but these days almost hourly.

Let’s think together again, soon.

Notes:  

1.  S.E. Cupp, “This Really May Be the Political End for Trump,” Midland Daily News, 4 December 2025.  Emphasis added.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/se-cupp-this-really-may-be-the-political-end-for-trump/ar-AA

Saturday, November 29, 2025

The “King of Fake’s” Double non-Standard©

 The “King of Fake’s” Double non-Standard© 

In a previous blog I referred to President Trump as the “king of fake,” not only because he calls most opposition media and news “fake,” but also because, as he so often does, he projects on to others the very things he does. A majority of what he says is lies, which makes HIM the king of fake.  

Here is yet another example of both tendencies. Mid-week last week he hosted Cyril Ramphosa, black president of South Africa, in the White House. An account of one segment of the meeting went as follows:

Trump then confronted Ramaphosa with unsubstantiated claims that South Africa’s Black-led government is anti-white and perpetrating a “white genocide” against local farmers—while Elon Musk, the South African-born billionaire, stood on the sidelines of the Oval Office.

“Have they told you where that is, Mr. President?” Ramaphosa said in response to the claims. “I’d like to know where that is, because this I’ve never seen.”

Fact-checkers later established that the footage Trump played didn’t actually show the “burial sites” of “over a thousand” white farmers.

The white crosses on display had been temporarily erected as a memorial to a white farming couple shot dead on their premises in 2020.

Trump claimed the “Fake News Media” were not covering the “genocide.”(1)

The President not only used “fake” information during the meeting, he used the Hitlerian-like ploy to assert that the “fake news media” wasn’t covering his “fake” news. Here we have more of the increasing mountain of evidence that Donald Trump is indeed a king–the king of fake.  

He frequently treats world leaders he doesn’t like, or those from countries he doesn’t like, in this fashion. On the other hand, dictators and murderers from authoritarian regimes like China, Russia, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia, more often get red carpet treatment, and as in the case of the murdering Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman in mid-November, defending him from questions about the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi and criticizing the reporter who ask the question for being unkind to his guest. It is okay for him to attack Ramaphosa, but reporters can't ask a murderer a question that might embarrass him. This exposes a double standard that is typical of the President, and when you stop to ponder the matter, you discover that it more importantly exposes the total lack of moral character of MAGA’s prince of fake. It isn't a double standard; he has no standards.

This the man MAGA apparently holds up to their children as a statesman, and the man who indeed will Make America Great Again. He is anything but a statesman, in fact, he is the exact opposite. And he certainly seems to enjoy insulting, demeaning, criticizing, and trying to humiliate leaders from countries all over the world. Make America Great Again? Huh! We are the laughing stock for electing him, but MAGA cataracts prevent them from clearly seeing the real character of a man whom the world sees crystal clear as a “fake” through and through.

Let’s think together again, soon.

Notes:

(1) Cameron Adams, “World Leader Absolutely Rips Trump’s Social Media ‘Insults,’” from The Daily Beast, 27 November 2025. Emphasis added. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/world-leader-absolutely-rips-trump-095913411.html

Note: segments of various amounts of this exchange were shown widely in the media.

Friday, November 21, 2025

How Do You Defend the Indefensible?©

 How Do You Defend the Indefensible?© 

Updated: Wednesday, 3 December 2025

This week President Trump, in his undeniable authoritarian manner, crossed a line that even many of his long-time supporters find impossible to defend, because it is indefensible. Six members of Congress, all military veterans or former CIA, published a short video recommending to today’s military that they are oath-bound not to follow or carry out an illegal order.  

The President took to his favorite medium, “Truth Social” to lash out in several posts, the last two of which said this was “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH” and a later re-posted comment that Democrats should be hanged.

In the following firestorm, some of his supporters had difficulty defending the indefensible. Mike Johnson said they were not the words he would choose, Lindsey Graham said the remarks were "over the top" and the President’s press secretary, when asked if the President wants to hang members of Congress said, “No,” but immediately, as is her and her boss’s want, went on the attack. But she mis-characterized the video as insubordination to the Commander-in-Chief, just as the Commander-in-Chief himself mis-characterized it. Leavitt intentionally left out the fact that the video stressed “illegal” orders.

Despite the fact that Leavitt said the president didn't want to hang the producers of the video, this is nonetheless a default reaction for the President. His character when under fire shows us where his mind and heart have been feeding. He is a pathological and violent man. His heart is filled with vengeance, anger, hate, and savagery. Evidence mounts by the day, week, and month of his true authoritarian nature--another indefensible issue.

For this record, I oppose, denounce, and publically speak out against a President who calls for the death of those who oppose him. He is so thin-skinned–and his skin seems to be getting thinner by the day–and so abominably ignorant that he nor his press secretary attack dog, know the difference between the words “legal” and “illegal”--if he is opposed it is automatically illegal--or they choose to ignore the difference, which itself is an ignorant move. But Leavitt is just a loyal attack dog and her ignorance is that she thinks the MAGA base will believe and accept her mis-representation of the video’s message.

The President continues to take things to new levels of low, even when you think he cannot. THIS IS REALLY DANGEROUS STUFF! We’ve never seen anything like it from a sitting President. And every American should be outraged and reject it and its proponent(s). Charlie Kirk's assassination and recent threats against Marjorie Taylor Greene and the “thousands” of immediate threats the six contributors to the video received following DJT’s remarks, among other examples, demonstrate the danger. President Trump is well aware of this. He does not rebuke or shun it, he leads the charge, taking it to a new nadir. He likes not only the “fight,” but he likes the violence, cruelty, pain, suffering, hate, and intimidation involved. American’s should be enraged that their leader descends to this brutalism on a daily basis. No American should ever defend this indefensible barbarism.

For me there is hope, not hopelessness. I see signs of a crack in MAGA, and I know Almighty God is in control. God forgive us for electing a heathen who relishes the barbarity of fascists, Nazis, and dictators.

Note, 3 December 2025:  On Monday, 1 December 2025, President Trump tweeted from the White House the following relative to the video Mark Kelly and others produced late in November.  He wrote:

Mark Kelly and the group of Unpatriotic Politicians were WRONG to do what they did and they know it!  I hope the people looking at them are not duped into thinking that it’s OK to openly and freely get others to disobey the President of the United States!
Again the President appears to purpously misinterpret the message of the Kelly, et al, video.  The lawmakers encouraged troops to refuse to carry out "illegal" orders, but our myopic and narcissistic President interprets the video's message as getting "others to disobey the President of the United States!" Obviously he thinks that as President his word is law--the very definition of a dictator. His incredible ignorance is incapable of making the not-so-subtle distinction between encouraging people not to follow illegal orders and disobeying the President--unless of course, all of his orders are illegal.  It is sad to see the leader of the free world, one who considers himself "a stable genius," to be this intellectually unable. Or, he knows exactly what he is doing in twisting every single thing to be about him and his authority. Even MAGA supporters should be able to see this is either monumental stupidity or equally monumental hutzpa, but it isn't truth or anything near it.  How long are the Maga folks willing to allow themselves to be, in the President's word, "duped" by him?

Let’s think together again, soon.

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

DJT: King of Fake, King of Lies©

DJT: King of Fake, King of Lies© 

King of “Fake”

On Monday, 10 November 2025, in and interview with Laura Ingraham in reference to polls showing economic pain, President Trump responded: “The polls are fake.  It’s a con job by Democrats.”

Donald Trump is a king, the King of Fake. "Fake" is a default response for him. When he encounters any news or poll that contradicts him, his position, or says something negative about him or his administration, he resorts to the same innane and overworked explanation. It is fake. Common sense and the law of averages suggests that not everything critical of DJT is fake, but the MAGA folks appear to swallow it hook, line, and sinker every time, or more probably true, they ignore it every time. They know it’s not fake, so they don’t defend it as such, but they find other equally silly explanations.

King of Lies

In the same interview, President Trump told Laura Ingraham that the United States enjoys the “greatest economy we’ve ever had.” He claimed that only beef and coffee were too high. University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wofers in an interview with Kaitlan Collins said in response on Tuesday:

“Look, every word the president just said is a lie. Worse with that, it’s such a lie that I worry that there’s literally a break with reality inside the man’s mind. I can tell you that because I’m a statistics nerd, and you can go to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, they’ve got people in supermarkets all across the country, and almost every category of goods or services sees the prices rising.

There’s not a single way you can interpret a word that the man’s saying right now as being remotely reflective of either what we’re seeing in data from all across the country, or in people’s everyday lives.” 

Lies and calling contrary information "fake,"  the standard fare of the President, are also so transparent that they make him the "king of transparency"--not a real genuine transparency of his administration, but the obviousness of another promise that turned out to be a lie, a fake promise.

This man boasts (he is also the "king of boasts") that he is making America great again, that he is reestablshing our respected position in the world. His self-delusion is impervious to the fact that to the world he, and we because we elected him, are the laughing stock among the nations.

I oppose a fake President, who wants to be king.  I oppose a lying President.  I oppose a self-deluded, arrogant boaster of a President.  I oppose a mean-spirited, vengeful, always-angry President.  I yearn for a President with character, integrity, and some empathy and compassion.

Lets think together again, soon.

Source: 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/economist-stunned-donald-trump-latest-075821174.html



 

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

The Apostle Paul, Charity, and President Trump©

 The Apostle Paul, Charity, and President Trump©

In October 1975, Elder Gordon B. Hinckley in a conference talk titled “Opposing Evil,” said among other things: “I am one who believes that we should earnestly and sincerely and positively express our convictions .... Let our voices be heard. I hope they will not be shrill voices, but I hope we shall speak with such conviction that those to whom we speak shall know of the strength of our feeling and the sincerity of our effort. I think the Lord would say to us, “Rise, and stand upon thy feet, and speak up for truth and goodness and decency and virtue.” God give us the strength, the wisdom, the faith, the courage as citizens to stand in opposition to these and to let our voices be heard in defense of those virtues which, when practiced in the past, made men and nations strong, and which, when neglected, brought them to decay.”(1)

In that spirit I again speak out as strong as I am able against the evil, total corruption, wickedness, felonies, liability for sexual abuse (rape), mysogny, illegal actions, abuse of power, perversity, petulance, pettiness, hostility, continual anger, monumental hubris, hypocrisy, indecency, vulgarity, hate, vengeance, meanness, rudeness, cruelness, ignorance, and perpetual lying of the President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump.  

One can look in vain through the history of the American presidency for a president who has a larger list of former supporters who, after working with him, then reject and oppose him as has President Trump.  We might add the large and growing list of members of the administration who subsequently write books exposing and/or opposing him or warning the public about him. I’ve pondered why this unprecedented avalanche doesn’t disturb the MAGA folk, but I stand totally bewildered by the phemenon.

So I speak out in opposition to the President today, with a simple comparison you may make for yourselves.

In 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 the Apostle Paul identifies 15 elements of the Christian attribute of charity, which he portrays as the supreme Christian characteristic–one without which we are “nothing.”  I will list them in order from the King James Version, with several alternatives from modern translations to help with some clarity. (The verse in 1 Cor 13 where they are found is enclosed in parentheses.  They are:

    KJV         NIV                 NET

1.  Is long-suffering (4)         patient          patient

2.  Is kind (4)

3.  Does not envy (4)                not envy           not envious

4.  Vaunteth not itself (4)          boast           brag

5.  Not puffed up (4)    proud           puffed up

6.  Not behave unseemly (5)    dishonor others           rude

7.  Seeks not her own (5)    not self-seeking           self-serving

8,  Not easily provoked (5)    not easily angered          not easily angered 

9.  Thinks no evil(5)     keeps no record          not easily resentful

                    of wrongs

10.  Rejoices not in 

       iniquity (6)               delight in evil    glad about injustice

11.  Rejoices in the truth (6)     rejoices with the

                    truth

12.  Bears all things (7)             protects

13.  Believes all things (7)     trusts

14.  Hopes all things (7)             hopes

15.  Endures all things (7)     preserves

Christian charity is a very high bar indeed.  Paul even says if one understands all mysteries and has all faith sufficient to move mountains, but does not have charity he is “nothing.”  If we give all of our goods to feed the poor, or our bodies as martyrs to the flames, and have not charity “it profiteth me nothing.” (1 Cor. 13:2-3) This kind of Christianity is serious business of the first order.  

Of the 15 elements Paul gives us, how many fit the President’s character? Actually, he is almost the exact opposite of two-thirds of them. There was a day in this country when the public would not brook his kind of behavior, but today apparently millions not only tolerate it, but encourage and applaud it. I find it extremely hard to believe that any decent mother holds him up as an example for her children to follow.

Some argue that his character and personal failings don't matter.  Again, I turn to the word of God and the teachings of living prophets.

Scripture: Wherefore, honest men and wise men should be sought for diligently, and good men and wise men ye should observe to uphold; otherwise whatsoever is less than these cometh of evil.(2)

David O. McKay:  No nation will become great whose trusted officers will pass legislation for personal gain, who will take advantage of a public office for personal preferment or to gratify vain ambition, or who will, through forgery, chicanery, and fraud, rob the government, or be false in office to a public trust.

Honesty, sincerity of purpose must be the dominant traits of character in leaders of a nation that would be truly great.(3) 

Neal A. Maxwell:  All about us we see hypocrisies as between public and private behavior, as if God had issued two sets of commandments—one for indoors and another for out-of-doors.(4)

Gordon B. Hinckley: It is not wise, or even possible, to divorce private behavior from public leadership–though there are those who have gone to great lengths to suggest that this is the only possible view of “enlightened” individuals.  They are wrong.  They are deceived.  By its very nature, true leadership carries with it the burden of being an example.  Is it asking too much of any public officer, elected by his or her constituents, to stand tall and be a model before the people–not only in the ordinary aspects of leadership but in his or her behavior?  If values, aren’t established and adhered to at the top, behavior down the ranks is seriously jeopardized and undermined.  Indeed, in any organization where such is the case–be it a family, a corporation, a society, or a nation–the values being neglected will in time disappear.(5)

I pray regularly, and invite you to join me, that the Lord will protect the Constitution of the United States with its separation of powers and the freedom and rights it guarantees us, and to preserve our inspired democratic heritage and protect us from Donald Trump's corruption, authoritarian tendencies and apparent desire to be our king.

Let’s think together, soon.

Notes:

 1.  Gordon B. Hinckley, "Opposing Evil," Ensign (November 1975):38-40.

2.  Doctrine and Covenants 98:10.

3.  David O. McKay, Pathways To Happiness, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1957, 3.

4.  Neal A. Maxwell, If Thou Endure it Well, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1996, 16.

5.  Gordon B. Hinckley, Standing for Something: Ten Neglected Virtues that Will Heal Our Hearts and Homes, New York: Random House, 2000, 170.